Cases 1 - 10 of 773
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6561
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Albert Anderson v. Foothills Correctional Institution
as 24-6557
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HUDGINS, Sergeant, MOTLEY, Correctional Officer and others
Wilson v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2024cv01660
Plaintiff:
Demiqou Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. Strom Law Firm et al
as 3:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Samuel T. Wiggins
Defendant:
Strom Law Firm, Pete Strom, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. Milam et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Brent Tyler Kelly
Defendant:
J. L. Milam, Daniel P. White, A. W. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
MCMILLIAN, Medical Provider, ERIC DYE, Warden, JEFFREY DUNCAN, Assistant Warden and others
Felix v. Anderson County Sheriff et al
as 8:2024cv03160
Plaintiff:
Rodney Saint Felix
Defendant:
Anderson County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Chad McBride, Deputy Jarred Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
RODNEY BROWN
Defendant:
OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE and OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne v. Hawes et al
as 7:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Robert James Wayne
Defendant:
Spencer Hawes, Kyle Irving, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Onaje Seabrook v. LT. Carter
as 24-6461
Plaintiff:
ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK
Defendant:
LT. CARTER, SGT. MILES PERKINS, JANE DOE #3, Health Care Authority and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
