Cases 1 - 10 of 3,068
Terry v. Frame
as 2:2024cv00735
Respondent:
Superintendent Jonathan Frame
Plaintiff:
Charles Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Norton et al
as 7:2024cv00869
Defendant:
Pamela Norton, Dr. Charles Hulbert and NP Crystal Large
Plaintiff:
Chris Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. PrimeCare Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03582
Defendant:
Charles County Detention Center, PrimeCare Medical, Inc., Zachary Rottman and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2024cv01076
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Green v. Stirling et al
as 2:2024cv07085
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Stephanie Skewes, Joel Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles v. Brooks et al
as 1:2024cv02203
Defendant:
Douglas Fleming, Matthew P. Snow, Pamela Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bingham v. Shaw et al
as 1:2024cv02201
Defendant:
Julie Lillrose Churchill, Detective Patrick Graham, Appeal Lawyer Charles E. Haden and others
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan Bingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetric Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia
as 24-7126
Defendant:
HONORABLE D. ARTHUR KELSEY, HONORABLE DONALD W. LEMONS, HONORABLE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIC MARKIE VENABLE
Carter v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00823
Defendant:
J.H. Bleivns, Thomas "Doe", Bailey "Doe" and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piercy v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Charles Scott Piercy
Defendant:
B. Johnson, B.R. Moore and D.J. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
