Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Goodman v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 1:2024cv00944
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Goodman
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tervin Goodman v. Warden of Broad River CI
as 24-6149
Petitioner:
TERVIN GOODMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN OF BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
DOVE v. RODGERS et al
as 1:2023cv00472
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL DOVE
Defendant:
WARDEN RODGERS, SERGEANT LAMBERT, OFFICER GOODMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Rodgers et al
as 5:2023ct03178
Plaintiff:
Marshall Dove
Defendant:
Warden Rodgers, Sergeant Lambert, Officer Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023ct03117
Plaintiff:
Roy Goodman
Defendant:
United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Genna D. Petre and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Goodman v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Kevin Goodman, Jr.
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodman v. Moose et al
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Goodman
Defendant:
Timothy Darryl Moose, Larry Williamson, Mike Slacole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Warden, Goodman Correctional Institution
as 1:2023cv00251
Petitioner:
Kerwin S. Parker
Respondent:
Warden, Goodman Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodman v. Stirling et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Tervin Goodman
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goodman v. Ramos et al
as 5:2022hc02187
Petitioner:
Jasper Deonta Goodman
Respondent:
Raphael Ramos and Collette S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
