Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Jackson v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jackson v. Buffaloe Jr. et al
as 5:2022ct03285
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Eddie Buffaloe Jr., Roy Cooper, Division of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James et al v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03237
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James, Larry Robinson, Anthony Michael Finney and others
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Eddie Buffaloe Jr., State of North Carolina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Broad River Correctional et al
as 0:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Broad River Correctional, Sgt Fleshmen, Sgt Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jackson v. Broad River Correctional Institution
as 0:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Walton v. Shiflet et al
as 3:2020cv00191
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerome Walton
Defendant:
Tom Harlem, Rick Haddix, Brian Shiflet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Department of Treasury
as 1:2020cv00201
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Michael Jackson, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Melvin Frazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson-El v. Dovey et al
as 1:2018cv03899
Respondent:
Brian E. Frosh and Richard Dovey
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson-El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Warden et al
as 1:2016cv02736
Plaintiff:
Donte Michael Jackson
Defendant:
Warden and Ricky Foxwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01907
Petitioner:
Michael Jackson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
