Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Medina v. USA
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Samuel Zuniga Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Medina v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Felix Medina
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMPSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
BRANDON E. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, DURHAM COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ANGELA ASHBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. City of Durham et al
as 5:2024ct03041
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
City of Durham, Durham County Police Department, Angela Ashby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Hardin v. Superintendent Roach
as 23-6973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROACH, SUPERINTENDENT ALBRIGHT, SUPERINTENDENT CROWE and others
Medina v. Warden, FCI Petersburg Low
as 3:2023cv00538
Petitioner:
Armando Medina
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Petersburg Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Clem v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Jason Clem
Defendant:
Israel Hamilton, Bernard Morris, Lyons Sanchezconcha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Miller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Medina Prue, Leslie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. USA
as 1:2023cv00042
Petitioner:
Samuel Zuniga Medina
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
