Cases 101 - 110 of 382
Barnett v. Bowen
as 5:2019ct03045
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Barnett, Jr.
Defendant:
Margaret Phillipe Bowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Town of South Hill et al
as 3:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Police Officers 1-20 John and Jane Doe, Ofc. M. Waters, Inv. B.J. Mull and others
Plaintiff:
Violet A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. North Charleston Police Department, The et al
as 2:2018cv03493
Plaintiff:
Rashawn Bowens
Defendant:
Officer Mark Nix, Officer Wilson Bishop and North Charleston Police Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowens v. North Charleston Police Department, The et al
as 2:2018cv03494
Plaintiff:
Shamika Bowens
Defendant:
Officer Mark Nix, Officer Wilson Bishop and North Charleston Police Department, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03390
Plaintiff:
Brenna (I) Myers-Forquer, Donald Haggart, Bernard Dickerson and others
Defendant:
Chemguard, Buckeye Fire Equipment Co., Kidde PLC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Adidas America Inc et al
as 3:2018cv03118
Defendant:
Thomas Gassnola, James Gatto, Adidas America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Bowen, II
Interested Party:
Dan Cutler
Cross Defendant:
Brian Bowen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Armistead v. Watson et al
as 5:2018ct03274
Defendant:
Laura P. Watson, Seth Edwards, Jennie Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
James Gregory Armistead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00725
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Doe v. DeWees et al
as 8:2018cv02014
Defendant:
Michael Andrews, Unidentified contractor, Joyce Schaum and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bowens v. USA
as 6:2018cv01702
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dexter Leon Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
