Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 121 - 130 of 140
Covington v. Cumberland County Board of Education, et al
as 5:2011cv00076
Plaintiff: Charlene Covington
Defendant: Cumberland County Board of Education and James Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In Re: James Troxler
as 11-107
Movant: In re: JAMES LEE TROXLER
:
US v. Troy Pelt We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-6402
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: TROY PELTS, a/k/a James Lee Start
Craft et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 3:2010cv00056
Plaintiff: James Lee Craft, James Lee Craft, Matthew Ray and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, Norman Sales, Rodney D. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Cullen v. Somerset County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00055
Plaintiff: Gary Cullen
Defendant: Somerset County, James Lee Henderson and Gary D. Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyner v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00015
Plaintiff: James Lee Tyner
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
JACOB-CAMPBELL, et al v. JAMES LEE MORRIS, et al
as 1:2009cv00213
Defendant: JAMES LEE MORRIS and ST. MICHAEL MOTOR EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff: VERONICA V. JACOB-CAMPBELL and JAY CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both
Tooley v. Ballard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00183
Petitioner: James Lee Tooley
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tooley v. Ballard
as 2:2009cv00183
Petitioner: James Lee Tooley
Respondent: David Ballard
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
US v. James Watkins
as 09-6204
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES LEE WATKINS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?