Cases 131 - 140 of 1,708
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Perkins v. Newcomer et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Paulus Irvin Perkins
Defendant:
D. Newcomer, Lynn Graham, J. Chittum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Trinity Food Service et al
as 7:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wade Graham
Defendant:
Trinity Food Service and Roanoke City Jail Kitchen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schiff v. Brown
as 1:2023cv00209
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Anderson et al
as 5:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Trevor G. Graham
Defendant:
Aaron B. Anderson, Brock and Scott PLLC, Closeline Settlement and others
WADDELL et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Aaron Waddell, Abreka Regues, Albert Sidney Palmer and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TMX FINANCE OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Schiff v. Brian Frosh et al
as 1:2022cv03383
Plaintiff:
Graham Schiff
Defendant:
Brian Frosh and Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Schiff v. Warden
as 1:2022cv03332
Petitioner:
Graham Schiff
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Markus McCormick v. Sasha Graham
as 22-7463
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARKUS ODON MCCORMICK
Defendant / Appellee:
SASHA GRAHAM, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, FAYETTEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Graham v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 8:2022cv04640
Plaintiff:
Angela Graham
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc and Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
