Cases 11 - 20 of 170
David Rowland, Jr. v. North Carolina
as 23-6279
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID L. ROWLAND, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA
Wesley v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wesley
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, LPD Officer Seth Reed, LPD Officer Austin Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rowland v. North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02210
Petitioner:
David L. Rowland, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Knight v. Clark et al
as 8:2022cv04511
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowland Knight and Gary Knight
Defendant:
Rick Clark and Drew Cisco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rowland v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03421
Plaintiff:
David L. Rowland, Jr.
Defendant:
Bonnie Pierce, Nationwide Insurance, Wake County Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Picken Co. Det. Cnt
as 8:2022cv03173
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowland Knight
Defendant:
Picken Co. Det. Cnt, Pickens County Detention Center and Ms. Makayla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rowlands v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Shane Rowlands
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WLR Investments LP v. Rowland
as 2:2022cv01892
Plaintiff:
WLR Investments LP
Defendant:
Thomas C Rowland, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Rowland v. Rogers
as 2:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Rowland, III
Defendant:
William L Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rowland et al v. ATC/BR LLC
as 2:2022cv01772
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Rowland, III, P Douglas McMillan and L Harris Chewning
Defendant:
ATC/BR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
