Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Brian Blakeman v. Joe Solana
as 20-6757
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS, N.C. Department of Public Safety, JOE SOLANA, Superintendent, Hyde Correctional Institution and MEDICAL STAFF, Hyde Correctional Institution
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRIAN M. BLAKEMAN
Kenrick Hamilton v. Michael Gaches
as 20-1139
Defendant / Appellee:
CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, Office of Civil Rights and Liberties/TSA, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Main Justice Building and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENRICK HAMILTON, a/k/a Brian M.
Blakeman v. Solana et al
as 5:2019ct03280
Defendant:
Joe Solana, Erik A. Hooks and Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jackson v. Latuga et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Plaintiff:
Corieonte L. Jackson
Defendant:
Wolcott Rivers P.C., Brian M. Latuga and Janee' D. Joslin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medrano et al v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2019cv02038
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Randy C. Barrera, Sheriff Charles A. Jenkins, Deputy Sheriff Brian M. Mothershead and others
Plaintiff:
Sara Haidee Aleman Medrano and Resources for Immigrant Support and Empowerment Coalition of Western Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 5:2017ct03144
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr. , James L. Knight , Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 7:2017cv00116
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr., James L. Knight, Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brian Burmaster v. J.C. Holland
as 17-6115
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN M. BURMASTER
Respondent - Appellee:
J. C. HOLLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
