Cases 11 - 20 of 519
Ricardo Lanier v. Justin Burns
as 23-7188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO EDWIN LANIER
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BURNS and ZANE CAPPS
James Burns v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05975
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
James Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Burns-Fisher et al
as 7:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
Universal Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kimberly Burns-Fisher and MISTY LAPOINTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Burns v. Scott
as 8:2023cv03077
Plaintiff:
Robert Burns
Defendant:
Gabriel Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Deaver et al v. Century Aluminum Company et al
as 2:2023cv05766
Plaintiff:
Leslie Deaver, Robert B. Deaver, Nicholas A. Marino and others
Defendant:
Century Aluminum Company and Century Aluminum of South Carolina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ricardo Lanier v. Justin Burns
as 23-7125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO EDWIN LANIER
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN BURNS and ZANE CAPPS
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Kurtz v. Burns
as 1:2023cv01342
Plaintiff:
Deloris Kurtz
Defendant:
William J. Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Burns v. Wallace
as 4:2023cv04829
Petitioner:
Alan L. Burns
Respondent:
Warden Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
