Cases 11 - 20 of 950
Magellan Technology, Inc. et al v. Dorbes LLC. et al
as 7:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Magellan Technology, Inc. and Ecto World, LLC. doing business as Demand Vape
Defendant:
Dorbes LLC. and Christian A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Christian v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
William David Christian, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Mithun Banerjee v. Rand Gelber
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
JUDGE RAND LEWIS GELBER, ADMIN JUDGE SHERRI DEBRA KOCH, JUDGE JOHN CHRISTIAN MOFFETT and others
Christian v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Zane Christian
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
de Back v. Greenbrier Outfitters, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Rudolf Christian de Back
Defendant:
Greenbrier Outfitters, Inc. doing business as Broadmoor Outfitters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Debbie Christian (Estate of Mitchell Christian) v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2024cv00719
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Debbie Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00359
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Doe et al v. Florence Baptist Temple et al
as 4:2024cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Florence Baptist Temple, Florence Christian School, Michael Baron Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 a Education discrimination and violation of Title IX
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
