Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Hicks et al v. Pep-Up, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00678
Defendant:
Walton Golman and Pep-Up, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Dayna Hicks and Terry Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laitala et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv02142
Plaintiff:
Dayna Laitala and Joseph Laitala
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stimers v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00659
Plaintiff:
Dayna A. Stimers
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00846
Plaintiff:
John Tucker Martin
Defendant:
Conmed Healthcare Management, Inc., John Harler, Dayna Vango and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29973
Plaintiff:
Dayna Roy and Larry D. Roy
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby
as 14-2011
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes
Defendant - Appellee:
DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections, DANIEL C. AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust, GREGORY MCINTYRE, Attorney and others
Holmes v. Causby et al
as 1:2014cv00241
Plaintiff:
Eugene T. Holmes
Defendant:
Dayna Causby, Daniel C. Ayscue, Gregory McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontenot v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv23970
Plaintiff:
Dayna Fontenot
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva, Jr. v. Dr. Harler et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Plaintiff:
Earl Lewis Silva, Jr.
Defendant:
John A. Dr. Harler and Dayna Mann LNP Vango
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cindy Sykes v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc.
as 14-1131
:
In re: FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED, WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CINDY SYKES, DAYNA SZILAGYI and CATHERINE CORRIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
