Cases 11 - 20 of 3,442
v. Cambridge et al
as 1:2024cv00978
Defendant:
Dr. John Edwin Cambridge and Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cambridge v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00979
Plaintiff:
Dr. John Edwin Cambridge
Defendant:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 7:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Dr Mullins, CO Johnson, C/O Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Biser et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
Paul Biser, Christopher Dean Chiles, Charles Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Markeke et al
as 5:2024ct03140
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Officer Markeke, Sergeant Hall, Lieutenant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Dr Phinnize J Fischer Middle School et al
as 6:2024cv03324
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Dr Phinnize J Fischer Middle School, Greenville County Schools, Olivia G Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Holmes v. Grant et al
as 4:2024cv03255
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Jacob Holmes
Defendant:
Quandara Grant, Dana Aiken, Major Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Archer v. Saunder et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Susan Michelle Archer
Defendant:
NP Saunder, Nurse Rose and DR Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Giant of Maryland LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01561
Plaintiff:
Dr Wilhelmina Taylor
Defendant:
Giant of Maryland LLC and Cheryl Travers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
