Cases 11 - 20 of 976
White v. Lott et al
as 3:2024cv01489
Plaintiff:
Ellis White
Defendant:
Leon Lott and Katelyn Jasak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Holley v. Woolard et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Betsy S. Holley and John L. Smith
Defendant:
Elvanetta S. Woolard, Pamela Fleming, Taneisha W. Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Ellis Jones
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Alexandria (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03067
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ellis
Defendant:
Todd Ishee and Susan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Ellis v. J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc et al
as 6:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Beulah K Ellis
Defendant:
J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc and Simon Property Group, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SWINTON v. DOUNG et al
as 1:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
ELLIS J. SWINTON, SR.
Defendant:
LAN DOUNG, TRONG NGUYEN and LINH NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
S.M. v. Ellis
as 1:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
S M, A M and S. M.
Defendant:
Kesean Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
