Cases 11 - 20 of 1,087
Cook v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Cook
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Rick White, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 2:2024cv01699
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hamilton
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
US v. Andre Hamilton
as 24-6310
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANDRE EMILIO HAMILTON
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
United States, Officer Bryant, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hamilton Nolan
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nolan v. GENERAL MOTORS LLC
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hamilton Nolan
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Patricia Mitchell v. Booz Allen Hamilton
as 24-1223
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MITCHELL
Defendant:
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON, INC.
Sarah Norris v. City of Asheville
as 24-1206
Plaintiff:
SARAH BODDY NORRIS, ABIGAIL TEMOSHCHUK-REYNOLDS, AMY HAMILTON and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, DEBRA CAMPBELL, in her official capacity as Asheville City Manager, D. TYRELL MCGIRT, in his individual capacity and official capacity as Director of the Asheville Parks and Recreation Department and others
Hamilton v. DPSCS
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Jahi Rashad Hamilton
Defendant:
DPSCS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
