Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Ward et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv15465
Plaintiff:
Dorothy J. Ward and Farris Ward
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13842
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ward and James J. Ward
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10514
Plaintiff:
Carolyn L. Ward and James J. Ward
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAG Mutual Insurance Company v. Brown et al
as 6:2014cv00353
Plaintiff:
MAG Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Byron Brown, Laurens County Obstetrics and Gynecology LLC, Pamela Neighbors and others
Counter_claimant:
Carroll Neighbors , Donald Ward , Lisa Dennie and others
Counter_defendant:
MAG Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. SuperValu, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv03459
Plaintiff:
Victoria J. Ward
Defendant:
SuperValu, Inc. and Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erspamer v. Ward et al
as 5:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Erspamer
Defendant:
Kelly J. Ward, D. D. Millsaps, J. Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Credit One Bank, NA
as 5:2012cv06845
Plaintiff:
Bonnie J. Ward
Defendant:
Credit One Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
BROCK v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATRICK BROCK, C.P.
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY EAVES PURDUE, LIEUTENANT ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratchford v. CSX Corporation et al
as 5:2009cv00358
Plaintiff:
Paul Ratchford
Defendant:
CSX Corporation, CSX Hotels, Inc., Michael J. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Ward v. Astrue
as 3:2007cv00013
Plaintiff:
Helen J. Ward
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
