Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Johnson v. Meadows et al
as 5:2018ct03267
Defendant:
M. Meadows, J. Hicks, Nurse Lezcak and others
Plaintiff:
Greg H. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2016cv03753
Plaintiff:
Ruby J Hicks and Donald L Hicks
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03250
Plaintiff:
Boyd J. Hicks
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenner et al v. Hicks et al
as 3:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jenner and Julia Markson
Defendant:
Phillip J. Hicks , William H. Dougherty and William E. Scherffius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv07331
Plaintiff:
Lavonne J. Hicks and Steven Hicks
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05761
Plaintiff:
Doreen J. Hicks
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04843
Plaintiff:
Loretta J. Hicks
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Burnley v. Bryan Norwood
as 11-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN RODGERS BURNLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRYAN T. NORWOOD, Colonel (pty), Chief of Police for the City of Richmond, JOHN VENUTI, Chief of Police - Virginia Commonwealth University, HOWARD J. HICKS, Captain and others
Burnley v. Norwood et al
as 3:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
John Rodgers Burnley
Defendant:
Bryan T. Norwood, John Venuti, Howard J. Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
Edith J. Hicks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
