Cases 11 - 20 of 549
Aborisade v. Kenny et al
as 1:2023cv02053
Plaintiff:
Oluwatoyin Gideon Aborisade
Defendant:
Christina Kenny, Joe Jenkins, Peter Giannakos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Bruton v. STIHL Incorporated USA
as 7:2023cv03474
Plaintiff:
Kenny Bruton
Defendant:
STIHL Incorporated USA doing business as STIHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Reeves et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03303
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Scott Reeves, Delbert Eugene Powell, Roderick Charles Prast and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
US v. Michael Carter
as 23-6603
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL KENNY CARTER, a/k/a Blaze
US v. Kenneth Wise
as 23-4398
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KENNETH MALIK WISE, a/k/a KG, a/k/a Kenny, a/k/a Big Psyxho
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Sargeant v. Aviva Life & Annuity Company et al
as 8:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
Sargeant Kenny and Sargeant Doris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Sargeant v. Aviva Life & Annuity Company et al
as 1:2023cv01375
Plaintiff:
Kenny Sargeant
Defendant:
Aviva Life & Annuity Company, Steve Yarn and Karen Yarn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
Harper v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kenny Harper
Defendant:
Sgt. Baker, Corporal Riddle and West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
