Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Carter v. Alvin S. Glenn Det Center et al
as 0:2015cv02583
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Carter
Defendant:
Alvin S Glenn Det Center, Ronaldo Myers, Kathy Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAGWELL v. DIMON et al
as 1:2014cv00495
Plaintiff:
DONALD RICHARD: BAGWELL
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON , MARIANNE A. LAKE , GRADY I. INGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Northern Neck Regional Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Gordon
Defendant:
Northern Neck Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon-Bey v. USA-2255
as 1:2011cv02760
Petitioner:
Maurice M. Gordon-Bey
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gordon et al v. Home Savings of America, F.S.B. et al
as 1:2010cv03135
Defendant:
Home Savings of America, F.S.B., Home Savings Bancorp and Daniel Scrocco
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Gordon and Jahnita Gomez Deleon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
US v. Maurice Gordon-Bey
as 10-4789
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE M. GORDON-BEY
Juan Gordon v. Gene Johnson
as 08-8556
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUAN M. GORDON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON
Gordon v. Gastroenterology Consultants, LTD. et al
as 2:2008cv00438
Plaintiff:
James M. Gordon and James M. Gordon
Defendant:
Gastroenterology Consultants, LTD., Gastrointestinal and Liver Specialists of Tidewater, PLLC, Irving Pike and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MASSEY et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP
as 1:2008cv00435
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATAION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC and GLAXOSMITHKLINE USA
Plaintiff:
MARY L MASSEY and ERA M GORDON
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv01475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
