Cases 11 - 20 of 32
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. NICKERSON
as 1:2015mc00032
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
JOHN J. NICKERSON
Lindo Nickerson v. Joseph Hall
as 15-6032
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINDO NICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH B. HALL and LINWOOD SUTTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP), et al. v. Holder et al
as 1:2014cv02110
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr. , Deborah K. Chasanow , Richard D. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Marinna L. Callaway , Jose Jehuda Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Nickerson v. McFadden
as 9:2014cv01888
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Nickerson
Respondent:
Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wagner v. Miller et al.
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Donika Anderson Wagner
Defendant:
James D. Miller, Ph.D. , Bermina Nickerson, Ph.D. , Alpana Dave, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickerson v. Hall et al
as 5:2013ct03105
Plaintiff:
Lindo Nickerson
Defendant:
Joseph B. Hall and Linwood Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Hall
as 5:2013hc02105
Petitioner:
Lindo Nickerson
Respondent:
Joseph B. Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howell v. Lockheed Martin Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Robert W Howell
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation , Debra McNemar , Lisa Cadle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
