Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Antonio Ortiz v. George Solomon
as 19-6456
Defendant:
DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER AT MARION PRISON, MEDICAL ADMINISTRATOR AT TROY PRISON, DISCIPLINARY HEARING OFFICER AT CALEDONIA PRISON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CARLTON JOYNER, OLUSHOLA METIKO, THAYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Lovelace v. Clarke et al
as 2:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Dr. Steve Herrick, Dr. Charles Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Obie Lovelace and Obie L. Lovelace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2016ct03320
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gibson
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Central Prison, Nash Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv02149
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Andrew Vaughn v. Harold Clarke
as 16-6184
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANDREW OBIE VAUGHN
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
360 Painting, LLC v. Obi
as 1:2015cv01064
Plaintiff:
360 Painting, LLC
Defendant:
Celestine Obi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vaughn v. Warden, Keen Mtn. Corr. Ctr.
as 2:2015cv00265
Petitioner:
Andrew Obie Vaughn
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Asby v. Chase Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 4:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Susan Asby
Defendant:
Chase Bank USA, N.A. and OBI Linings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Seigler et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33929
Plaintiff:
Pauline Seigler and Obie Seigler
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
