Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 3,551
Dennis Smith, Jr. v. Sgt. Rogers
as 24-6324
Plaintiff: DENNIS KEITH SMITH, JR.
Defendant: SERGEANT ROGERS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, LT. JONES, Hampton Roads Regional Jail, COL. J. VERGAKIS, Hampton Roads Regional Jail and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ward v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff: Roger Dale Ward
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Seabrooks v. Richland County et al
as 2:2024cv02905
Plaintiff: Roger L. Seabrooks, Jr.
Defendant: Richland County, Crayman Harvey, Kevin McCollough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00777
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Monzon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff: Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant: L Rogers, Shenica Royster, Erick Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Aldo DiBelardino v. Jason Miyares
as 24-1269
Plaintiff: ALDO DIBELARDINO
Defendant: JASON S. MIYARES, Virginia Attorney General, PETER VINCENT CHIUSANO, MARK S. SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Charles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00125
Petitioner: Roger Dale Charles, II
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?