Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Cincinnati Insurance Company, The v. Murphy et al
as 7:2022cv03080
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company, The
Defendant:
Collins Murphy, Alexandra R Moro, Paris L Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Dagostine et al v. Pendleton et al
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dagostine and Ramona Dagostine
Defendant:
Mark Pendleton, Baker Tilly US, LLP, Arnett Carbis Toothman LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Thomas v. Holland et al
as 5:2021ct03370
Plaintiff:
Arnett Thomas
Defendant:
J.C. Holland, Warden T. Scarantino and Robin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Jackson et al
as 5:2021ct03362
Plaintiff:
Arnett Thomas
Defendant:
Robin Jackson, J.C. Holland, Warden Scarantino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Samuel Arnett, Jr.
as 21-4638
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SAMUEL ARNETT, JR.
Stallings v. Arch Insurance Company et al
as 2:2021cv03349
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stallings
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company and Jerry B Arnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thomas v. Jackson et al
as 5:2021ct03239
Plaintiff:
Arnett Thomas
Defendant:
Robin Jackson, Officer M. Jackson and Tucson Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Momolu Sirleaf v. Jimmy Doe
as 21-6784
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY DOE, in his Official Capacity, MATIANGAI ARNETT, Counselor, in her Individual Capacity and UNKNOWN DOE, in his Official Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Pharoah and Priest of the Commonweath of Israel
Jones v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00536
Plaintiff:
Arnette Delores Jones
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Sirleaf v. Doe et al
as 7:2021cv00237
Plaintiff:
Priest Momolu V.S. Sirleaf and Monolu Sacker Sirleaf
Defendant:
Emma S. Urey, Jimmy Doe and Counselor Matiangai Arnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
