Cases 21 - 30 of 32
John Baccus v. Chris Florian
as 12-7940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRIS FLORIAN, JORDAN MOORE, NC MERCHANT and others
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY CLERK OF COURT
Baccus v. Florian et al
as 9:2012cv02440
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Chris Florian, Jordan Moore, William B Byars, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Bartram et al
as 3:2012cv01511
Plaintiff:
Mark Delane Ward
Defendant:
Shawn P. Bartram, Alfred E. Ferguson, West Virginia State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 2:2011cv02958
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of and Nikki R Haley
Amicu:
United Mexican States , Government of Argentina , Government of Bolivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition et al v. Haley et al
as 2:2011cv02779
Plaintiff:
Lowcountry Immigration Coalition , Mujeres De Triunfo , Nuevos Caminos and others
Defendant:
Nikki Haley , Alan Wilson , James Alton Cannon and others
Amicu:
United Mexican States , Government of Argentina , Government of Bolivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
US v. Emory Chile
as 11-6715
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMORY TAYLOR CHILES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chiles v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Emory Chiles
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Chiles v. Mosley
as 3:2009cv00390
Petitioner:
William B. Chiles
Respondent:
FNU Mosley
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Emory Chiles
as 09-7440
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EMORY TAYLOR CHILES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
