Cases 21 - 30 of 174
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David v. En Pointe Productions LLC, et al
as 1:2022cv00287
Defendant:
Carrie A Groenwold, Deviant Entertainment, LLC, Gorgon LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gailen Lee David
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Juana Marquez-Membreno v. Merrick Garland
as 22-1533
Petitioner:
JUANA MARQUEZ-MEMBRENO and H.T.P.M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Marquez v. SFF Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00064
Petitioner:
Lorena Marquez
Respondent:
SFF Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marquez v. SFF-Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Lorena Marquez
Respondent:
SFF-Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Moss v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv03256
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Moss
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Lt, Murphy, Sgt. Lovelist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
WARD v. USA
as 1:2021cv00944
Petitioner:
TREVON MARQUEZ WARD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hernandez et al v. Nelson Precast Products LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02814
Plaintiff:
JOSE LUIS VELASQUEZ HERNANDEZ, Jose Luis Velazquez Hernandez and Edwin Rodolfo Marquez
Defendant:
NELSON PRECAST PRODUCTS LLC, AARON LICHTMAN and Nelson Precast Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jose Chicas-Marquez v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2347
Petitioner:
JOSE EMILIO CHICAS-MARQUEZ, YANETH ESTHER CEDILLOS DE CHICAS, J.M.C.D. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Spann-Mitchell v. Sheriff Kristin Graziano
as 0:2021cv03153
Petitioner:
Marquez Mitchell-Spann and Marquez Spann-Mitchell
Respondent:
Sheriff Al Cannon, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center, Warden, Sheriff Al Cannon Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
