Cases 21 - 30 of 185
Michael Braxton v. Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
as 22-7232
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ANDERSON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Braxton v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2022cv02806
Petitioner:
Michael T Braxton and Michael Todd Braxton
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of the Anderson County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Mehta v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv00917
Plaintiff:
Rukminesh Mehta
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Maggie J. Kuhl, The Kuhl Law Office, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Braxton v. Scarborough et al
as 8:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Braxton
Defendant:
Joette Scarborough, A. Boyd, C. York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
US v. Michael McGee
as 21-6777
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. MCGEE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Braxton v. Warden of Kershaw Correctional
as 21-6264
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. BRAXTON
Hollins v. West et al
as 5:2020cv04317
Defendant:
Robert Bullard, Jeanise Singleton, Archie Sanderson and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Parker et al v. Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership et al
as 8:2020cv03581
Plaintiff:
Patrice Parker and Michael T. Parker
Defendant:
Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company Limited Partnership, NewRez, LLC, d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
