Cases 21 - 30 of 19,508
HILL v. ISHEE
as 1:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
TODD ISHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Scott
as 6:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson and Joshua HayMaker
Defendant:
Brittany D Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mitchell v. Mayflower Transit, LLC
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Mitchell
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11706 Carmack Amendent
Iannacone v. Ellison et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
William Iannacone
Defendant:
J. D. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Mark McAuley v. Northfield Insurance Company
as 24-1421
Plaintiff:
MARK JOSEPH MCAULEY
Defendant:
NORTHFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, SUNSHINE 11, LLC, d/b/a Relax Inn, USHA PATEL and others
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-6453
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goad v. Patrick County Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Ronnie D. Goad
Defendant:
Patrick County Jail, Deputy(s), Deputy Kenny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamza Tebib v. Allison Capps
as 24-6452
Plaintiff:
HAMZA TEBIB
Defendant:
ALLISON S. CAPPS, ADA, Granville County, ADA BROWN, Granville County District Attorney's Office, CHIEF JAMES CHAMPION, Butner Police Safety and others
Commissioner of Public Works of The City of Charleston v. Dude Products Inc.
as 2:2024cv02935
Plaintiff:
Commissioner of Public Works of The City of Charleston d/b/a Charleston Water System, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
Defendant:
Dude Products Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
