Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Dew v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv27972
Plaintiff:
Christina Dew
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roy Miller v. David Parrish
as 13-1729
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY E. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID T. PARRISH, Sued individually and in his official capacity, RONALD B. LECARPENTIER, Sued individually and in his official capacity, JOHN DOE #1, Sued individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant:
HANOVER COUNTY, THOMAS R. DEW, Sued individually and in his official capacity, STEPHEN ROYALTY, Sued individually and in his official capacity and others
Dew et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02848
Plaintiff:
Frances Dew and Thomas H. Dew
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Parrish et al
as 3:2012cv00873
Plaintiff:
Roy E. Miller
Defendant:
David T. Parrish , Ronald B. Lecarpentier , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Dew, et al v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv00129
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Karen Dew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
National Electrical Benefit Fund v. DEW Electric, LLC
as 8:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
National Electrical Benefit Fund
Defendant:
DEW Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Dew v. USA
as 7:2012cv00161
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Dew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dews v. Miles et al
as 8:2012cv01259
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dews
Defendant:
Shavella Miles, Marion Tuthill, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Dews v. USA
as 8:2011cv00962
Plaintiff:
Brandon Dews
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waiters v. Singh et al
as 5:2011ct03037
Plaintiff:
Quinea M. Waiters
Defendant:
Doctor Singh, Annie Harvey, Ms. Dew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
