Cases 31 - 40 of 3,435
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, William K. Marshall, Didymus Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Dr. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Dr. Christopher Chircher
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Walter L. Wright
Defendant:
Dr. Christopher Chircher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Burt v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6466
Plaintiff:
PAUL LEIGH BURT
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Head Virginia Prisons, DR. WILLIAM MILES, Physician and DR. HENCHCROFF, Orthopedic Specialist
Outlaw v. Meade et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas James Outlaw
Defendant:
Barbara Meade, Dr. Johnson and Dr. Ober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Umar Adeyola v. Edavally Reddy
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant:
DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, JENNIFER ADKINS, MS. BUNN and others
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. McCoy et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Karsten Allen
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, Major Cain, Unit Manager Earnshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
MCALLISTER v. NAPH CARE et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Defendant:
NAPH CARE, MS. CORRELL, MS. COWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
