Cases 31 - 40 of 140
De La Garza v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv09836
Plaintiff:
Cynthia De La Garza
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Garza v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv08877
Plaintiff:
Sarita De La Garza
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
De La Garza et v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06607
Plaintiff:
Sarita De La Garza and Amado De La Garza
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan v. Black Lives Matter Organization et al
as 6:2016cv02599
Plaintiff:
Jack Logan
Defendant:
Black Lives Matter Organization, Patrisse Cullers, Opal Tometi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
GARZA v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00608
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. GARZA
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 16-1604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY ADOFF, AGV SPORTS GROUP, INC., MICHAEL PARROTTE and others
Plaintiff:
JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC. and JAY CLOGG
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and METLIFE GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2016cv01564
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Flores et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv01455
Plaintiff:
Martha S. Flores and Juan Garza
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 2:2016cv00673
Plaintiff:
San Juana Garza and Antonio Garza
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
