Cases 31 - 40 of 27,552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hanna v. Baltimore City Board of Elections et al
as 1:2024cv01537
Plaintiff:
Will J. Hanna, II
Defendant:
Baltimore City Board of Elections, Armstead Jones, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Lowe et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Dominic A. Lowe, Eyan A. Moore and Pedro Marcelino
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, J. Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Copley v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Carlos J. Copley
Defendant:
Polaris Industries Inc. and Polaris Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. McRae et al
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Owen Morris, Jr.
Defendant:
G. McRae, Mark Taylor, Charles Kamm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raquel Stith v. Wesley Townsend
as 24-6505
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL STITH
Defendant:
WESLEY TOWNSEND, Chief of Security/Captain and J. D. FULK, Lieutenant/Watch Commander
Wright v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
James Glenn Wright
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Shore United Bank, N.A. v. Tough et al
as 3:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Shore United Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
David G Tough, Neville B Tough, Pamela J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Linder v. Tolson et al
as 9:2024cv03159
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wayne Linder
Defendant:
Kevin R Tolson, John G. Hicks, Sgt. Ratchford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
