Cases 31 - 40 of 184
McPherson v. Mutter
as 1:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
Wayne McPherson
Respondent:
Brad Douglas and R. S. Mutter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Temple v. McMaster et al
as 8:2022cv03895
Plaintiff:
Dennis Temple
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Bryan Stirling, Unknown Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Hudson v. Shaw et al
as 5:2022ct03361
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Sgt. Fredrick Shaw, Corey D. Collins, Brenda J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00375
Plaintiff:
Mecca McPherson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mosby v. Bullard et al
as 5:2022ct03347
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Jamie Bullard, Mark Barnhill, Marc A. McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Jackson et al
as 5:2022ct03338
Plaintiff:
John Scott Hudson
Defendant:
Glenda Jackson, Shana Henderson, Unit Manager Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodhouse v. City of Virginia Beach et al
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ashley Dallas Woodhouse
Defendant:
City of Virginia Beach, Eric Woodhouse, Fredrick McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pelican's SnoBalls USA, LLC v. Leapy's and Crocky's Ice Cream & Snow Balls LLC et al
as 4:2022cv02348
Plaintiff:
Pelican's SnoBalls USA, LLC
Defendant:
Leapy's and Crocky's Ice Cream & Snow Balls LLC, Robert Dean Russell, III and Bory Jay McPherson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
McPherson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02124
Petitioner:
James Brian McPherson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
