Cases 31 - 40 of 174
US v. Marquez Forte
as 21-7557
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARQUEZ STEVEN FORTE, a/k/a Lou, a/k/a Pretty Lou
Zywicki v. Washington et al
as 1:2021cv00894
Plaintiff:
Todd Zywicki and Professor Todd Zywicki
Defendant:
Gregory G Washington, James Hazel, Horace Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Marquez et al v. India Bazaar, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv01775
Plaintiff:
Jose Marquez, Juan Marquez and Lazaro Zelaya
Defendant:
India Bazaar, Inc., India Bazaar, LLC and Jasbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marquez et al v. India Bazaar, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01775
Plaintiff:
Jose Orlando Marquez, Juan Carlos Marquez and Lazaro Zelaya
Defendant:
India Bazaar, Inc., India Bazaar, LLC and Jasbir Singh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kinard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01077
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Keaston D. Kinard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mast v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01074
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Mast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01076
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Emonte A. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01075
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Mark Bethea, Dennis Patterson and others
Plaintiff:
Daiquan L. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbit, Jr. v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00960
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Kenneth Sharp, Mark Bethea and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Nesbit, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00670
Defendant:
Lt. Reddick, Sr. Cpl. Abraham, Lt. John Shirah and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Alexander Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
