Cases 31 - 40 of 224
Nguyen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv01627
Plaintiff:
Tuyet T Nguyen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chappel v. Xuan Nguyen et al
as 2:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Mai Chappel
Defendant:
Xuan Nguyen and Qui
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Nguyen v. Young
as 5:2021cv00676
Petitioner:
Phong Nguyen
Defendant:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHIKI, INC. v. PHI HO RESTAURANT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv00920
Plaintiff:
SHIKI, INC.
Defendant:
PHI HO RESTAURANT CORPORATION and PHI HO INTERNATIONAL SERVICE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
HO PHI NGUYEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
US v. Phong Nguyen
as 21-4620
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PHONG DUC NGUYEN, a/k/a Pho Duc Nguyen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Gibson et al v. RPS Holdings LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
Cielo Jean Gibson, Clark Florian, Cora Skinner and others
Defendant:
RPS Holdings LLC d/b/a Capital Cabaret and Phong Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
