Cases 31 - 40 of 8,602
Clark v. Mecklenburg County Sheriffs et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Tony Clark, Jr.
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Sheriffs, FNU Stafford, FNU Fennell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
US v. Nathaniel Brown
as 24-4295
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NATHANIEL J. BROWN, a/k/a Nathaniel Jay Brown
Matthew Budney v. Nurse Julie
as 24-6529
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY
Defendant:
NURSE JULIE, NURSE ASHLEY, SHERIFF REYNOLDS, Laurens County and others
Brown v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 6:2024cv03275
Plaintiff:
Doretha Brown
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Hunter v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Plaintiff:
Khamari Hunter
Defendant:
Trisha Brown, Gabe Morgan and Garrett Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Brown et al
as 1:2024cv00943
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Brown, Green and Control
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv03259
Plaintiff:
Eric Wright
Defendant:
E. Brown and G. Peabody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Intrepid Paralegal Solutions, LLC et al v. Ziperman et al
as 1:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Intrepid Paralegal Solutions, LLC and Daniel Manoff
Defendant:
Philip Ziperman and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
