Cases 41 - 50 of 754
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
WHITE v. CHALQ, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
ALEX WHITE
Defendant:
CHALQ, INC., GABE HILL and AUSTIN DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Wilson v. Rodriguez
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Wilson
Defendant:
Alex Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Vanz et al v. Ramsden et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Elena Vanz and Alex Nunes
Defendant:
Simeon Ramsden, Kipling Ventures Holding Co LLC, Kipling Reserve LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Case v. FCA US LLC
as 1:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Alex Case
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lindquist v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Alex Lindquist
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
US v. Alejandro Garcia
as 23-6490
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEJANDRO SALINAS GARCIA, a/k/a Alex
Randolph v. Clayton et al
as 1:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
Juan Alex Randolph, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Clayton, Officer COII J. Milliner and Officer West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arnold et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ronald Hugh Arnold, John Matthew Abboud, Frank T Abel and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
