Cases 41 - 50 of 752
Farris et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02881
Defendant:
The 3M Company, AGC Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Farris, Gregory Kelton, Patricio Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and JOHN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Telly Armstrong
as 23-6621
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TELLY SURVAR ARMSTRONG, a/k/a Telly Savalas Armstrong
CDN Innovations, LLC v. Armstrong Utilities, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
CDN Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Armstrong Utilities, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Armstrong v. Sumner
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Quentin T. Sumner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sammons et al v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Kim Sammons and Eric Sammons
Defendant:
James Armstrong, Armstrong Trucking 1, LLC and John Doe Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, A.G. BATEMAN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA and KOURY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
US v. Telly Armstrong
as 23-6387
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TELLY SURVAR ARMSTRONG, a/k/a Telly Savalas Armstrong
Lashley v. Armstrong
as 9:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Michael Aspield Lashley and Michael Asfield Lashley
Defendant:
Julie J. Armstrong
Respondent:
Director of the Al Cannon Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
