Cases 41 - 50 of 547
HOLMAN v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, ET AL.,
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
QUENTON DAMON HOLMAN
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT, A.T. WIGGS, K. KLUTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Hopper v. William Salazar
as 23-1050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD DAMONE HOPPER
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SALAZAR
Simpkins v. Morgan
as 2:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
Damon R. Simpkins
Defendant:
Ron Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
US v. Damon Jackson
as 22-7394
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAMON TAQUAN JACKSON, a/k/a DJ, a/k/a Daddy Frost
Matthew Orso v. Douglas-Ray Sullivan
as 22-2177
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW E. ORSO, d/b/a Zeekrewards.com, in his capacity as Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD DISNER, TRUDY GILMOND, TRUDY GILMOND, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DARLENE ARMEL, RONALD COX, FRANK SCHEUNEMAN and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS-RAY SULLIVAN
Nash v. Eves
as 7:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Allen Dewayne Nash
Defendant:
Deborah Damon, Chris Adkins, Carrie Painter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. USA - 2255
as 8:2022cv02533
Petitioner:
Damon Elliott
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bass v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City et al
as 1:2022cv02278
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bass
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Police Department, Harrison S. Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Hopper v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00454
Plaintiff:
Gerald Damone Hopper
Defendant:
Gary McFadden, FNU LeBliss, Wellpath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
