Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Young et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00054
Defendant:
FMC Corporation, Genuine Parts Company doing business as National Automotive Parts Association also known as NAPA, Georgia-Pacific LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M. Young and Sara Workman
Cross Defendant:
Crane Environmental, Inc., William Powell Company and Genuine Parts Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Charpia v. Young et al
as 2:2012cv03252
Plaintiff:
Howard W Charpia
Defendant:
Roger M Young , Edgar W Dickson , Ninth Judicial Circuit, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07006
Plaintiff:
Victoria M. Young and Stanley M. Young
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00468
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Vernon M. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Young-Bey v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Liam Kennedy and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Harbaugh et al
as 1:2011cv02034
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Jason Harbaugh and Keith Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harless v. Centra Health, Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv00024
Defendant:
Centra Health, Inc., Virginia Baptist Hospital and Brenda M. Young
Plaintiff:
Brittany M. Harless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Young-Bey v. Oakley et al
as 1:2011cv01444
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Defendant:
Scott S. Oakley, Paula K. Williams and Lenora Adegbesan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young-Bey v. Shearin
as 1:2011cv01095
Petitioner:
Jeffrey M. Young-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Shearin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
