Cases 41 - 50 of 78
US v. Ronald Monk
as 13-6888
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD MICHAEL DWAYNE MONK
Camacho et al v. Graff et al
as 2:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Agustin Esparza Camacho and Maria Susana Leon
Defendant:
Cody Graff , Ray Barwick , Monks Corner Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Monk et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
Larry Dennell Monk, II and A.R.L.M.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Harnett County Child Support Enforcement, Tiffany Michelle McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Monk et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Monk, Sr. and D.J.M., Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, William Graham, Denise Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
US v. Mark Vernon
as 11-4915
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY VERNON, a/k/a Monk
Monk v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00036
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda Monk
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Monk v. Colvin
as 2:2011cv00513
Plaintiff:
Joyce A. Monk
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rhodes v. Monk
as 7:2011cv00366
Defendant:
Monk
Plaintiff:
Paul Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farrakhan v. Johnson et al
as 7:2011cv00185
Defendant:
K. Austin, Sgt. Baily, Mrs. Ball and others
Plaintiff:
Shaka Amir Farrakhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
