Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Ripley et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25643
Plaintiff:
Ady Ripley and Gene Ripley
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ripley et al v. J. Henry Holland Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Bernard W. Ripley and Deborah H. Ripley
Defendant:
J. Henry Holland Corporation , Waco, Inc. , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Sleboda v. Puskas et al
as 2:2013cv30805
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Grace Sleboda
Defendant:
George Michael Puskas, II, Town of Ripley Police Department, Ripley Youth Soccer Club and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ripley et al v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 5:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Ripley , Andrew J. Ripley and Dean P. Ripley
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
William Parker v. Ripley Rand
as 12-7862
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM S. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
RIPLEY EAGLES RAND, Superior Court Judge, TOM FORD, Assistant District Attorney and CONNIE R. EASON, Extradition Secretary
Sanford v. Ripley et al
as 8:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Craig Sanford
Defendant:
Scott B. Ripley, Thomas H. Ripley, Fawcett Boat Supplies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ripley v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv01012
Petitioner:
Damon M. Ripley
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00876
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parker v. Rand et al
as 5:2011ct03201
Plaintiff:
William S. Parker
Defendant:
Ripley Rand, Tom Ford and Connie R. Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
