Cases 41 - 50 of 535
Luxe Properties, LLC et al v. West et al
as 7:2022cv00648
Defendant:
DJRC, LLC, Travis Schaffer, LLC, Daniel West and others
Plaintiff:
Luxe Properties, LLC, Jennifer M. West and Levi Dickenson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Shelton v. Ford
as 7:2022cv00698
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Amanda C. Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Scarantino
as 5:2022hc02196
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Shelton
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv02897
Plaintiff:
Enrico E.M. Brown
Defendant:
Col. Jerome Smith, Prince George's County Department of Corrections, Director Cornne Labbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kazimierczak v. Rhodes et al
as 1:2022cv03579
Plaintiff:
Cameron Kazimierczak
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mai Chappel v. Spivey Shelton
as 22-1906
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAI CHAPPEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SPIVEY SHELTON and SARAH SPIVEY
Ray v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
James Shelton Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mr. Joshua Stein, Town of Cary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Karsten Allen v. B. Sater
as 22-6930
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER B. SATER, SERGEANT E. J. DALES, OFFICER B. VIARS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Allen v. Shelton et al
as 7:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Karsten O. Allen
Defendant:
Charolette Shelton, Michael Pozeq, Barbara Buenaqa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
