Cases 41 - 50 of 2,620
Carroway et al v. Cepco Management Services, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Carl Carroway, Lisa Walker Young, Mary Ryan Shepard and others
Defendant:
Cepco Management Services, LLC and Lantana Crossing HOA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Dieffenbacher v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Paulo Vicente Dieffenbacher
Defendant:
Eric Young, Lori Nicholson, David Bauguess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kleger et al v. Dorchester County, Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Cindy Kleger and Roger Allan Young
Defendant:
Dorchester County, Maryland, Warden Don Satterfield, Officer Davion Jammal Batson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d Civil Rights (Death)
Moore v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Richard Kareem Moore
Defendant:
Solicitor: Elizabeth B. Young and Head Public Defender: DeGrant Gibbons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Chief of Security Headquarters, T.A. Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Family Dollar Stores of Columbia, SC Inc.
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Valerie Young
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Columbia, SC Inc. doing business as Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Jovan Brown v. Ron Lawrenz
as 24-6045
Plaintiff:
JOVAN M. BROWN
Defendant:
RON LAWRENZ, ERIC RAMOS and LISA YOUNG
Young v. USA
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Lantis Jeton Young
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
