Cases 51 - 60 of 7,641
US v. Sequan Fowler
as 24-4269
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SEQUAN ANTHONY FOWLER, a/k/a Smoke
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Gardner, Jr. v. Kenyatta Momon
as 24-1424
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LAMONT GARDNER, JR.
Defendant:
KENYATTA MOMON, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department, THOMAS ARMEL, in his individual and official capacity as a member of the Fairfax County Police Department and COUNTY OF FAIRFAX
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03111
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, Lt. Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mason v. Militana et al
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
Anthony N. Mason
Defendant:
Dr. Mark Militana, C. Riner, C. Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Anthony Williams
as 24-6453
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY D. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Ray L. Dixon
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
Fleming v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Fleming
Defendant:
Talena Lee, Anthony J. Mincey, FNU Olson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
