Cases 51 - 60 of 305
DICKERSON v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00149
Defendant:
WARDEN CARLOS HERNANDEZ and Secretary ERIK HOOKS
Petitioner:
Mr. Jerome Andrew Dickerson and JEROME ANDREW DICKERSON
Respondent:
ERIK HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
US v. Brandon Dickerson
as 21-6230
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON DICKERSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Brandon Dickerson
as 21-6213
Defendant / Appellant:
BRANDON DICKERSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. Billy Dickerson, Jr.
as 21-6173
Defendant / Appellant:
BILLY RAY DICKERSON, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stacy et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2018cv03402
Plaintiff:
Michael Hybert, Robin McGaughey, Cleveland Holloway and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., Tyco Fire Products LP, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kandare v. Gillies (Kandare) et al
as 2:2020cv00318
Defendant:
Hon. James Clayton Lewis, Wesley Kandare, Joanne Gillies (Kandare) and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kandare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Viskovich v. Under Armour, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03390
Defendant:
Jerri L. Devard, A.B. Krongard, Lawrence P. Molloy and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Viskovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marcus Gaskins v. Phil Hager
as 20-2126
Defendant / Appellee:
PHIL HAGER, Director of the Office of Planning and Zoning, GREGORIO AFRICA, Director of the Department of Inspections and Permits and SHERRI DICKERSON, Director of the Office of Personnel
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS C. GASKINS
Burns v. Humbug et al
as 4:2020cv03667
Plaintiff:
Octavious Bryan Burns
Defendant:
Sheriff Humbug and Chad Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Stephan
as 2:2020cv03467
Respondent:
Michael Stephan
Petitioner:
David A. Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
