Cases 51 - 60 of 193
Ibrahim v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02529
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Faruk Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kourouma v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02538
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Falaye Kourouma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Cuhna v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02539
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Gustavo Abalo Cuhna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Campos-Garcia v. Donald Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02537
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Campos-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Walden v. Trump et al
as 8:2020cv02528
Defendant:
Johnathan Horton, Matthew Albence, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Walden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
E.V. Drake v. Travelers Indemnity Company
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
EAST TEXAS BRIDGE, INC., SASHA MORENO, JOANNA BREYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC V. DRAKE, a/k/a E. V. Drake
GALEAS-MENCHU-EL v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv00761
Defendant:
LISA Y. JOHNSON-TONKINS, STEVEN TURNER MNUCHIN and DONALD J. TRUMP
Plaintiff:
JORGE GALEAS-MENCHU-EL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westfall v. Trump et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Westfall
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump and Steven T. Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
West v. Trump
as 1:2020cv02355
Defendant:
Donald Trump
Plaintiff:
Vesta West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
District of Columbia v. Donald Trump
as 20-1839
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and STATE OF MARYLAND
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity
Amicus Curiae:
JUDICIAL EDUCATION PROJECT and SETH BARRETT TILLMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
