Cases 61 - 70 of 128
JACKSON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 1:2020cv00533
Plaintiff:
SPANDORA JACKSON
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheila Logan v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 19-2320
Defendant / Appellee:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INCORPORATED and JOHN DOE, an Employee of Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHEILA LOGAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carroll v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02613
Plaintiff:
Randall Carroll
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Regina Lewis v. Dollar Tree Corporate
as 19-1756
Plaintiff:
LEONARD LEE, TONYA FOX, DAMEON TRENT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CATHERINE E. PUGH, DOLLAR TREE CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS, BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REGINA LEWIS
Logan v. Dollar Tree Stores Inc et al
as 6:2019cv01769
Defendant:
John Doe and Dollar Tree Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
Sheila Logan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Dollar Tree Corporate Headquarters et al
as 1:2019cv01473
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lee, Regina Lewis, Tonya Fox and others
Defendant:
Major Dennis Belp, Colonel Robert McMcullough, Colonel Alexander Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Oates et al v. Dollar Tree Corporate Headquaters et al
as 1:2019cv01420
Defendant:
Andre Davis, Terrance Sheridanin, Woodland Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wayne Oates and Emanuel David Joshua Oates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 d
Randall v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01409
Plaintiff:
Sherri Randall
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GARRISON v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICOL GARRISON
Defendant:
DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
