Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,644
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Jeffrey R. Baker v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv04608
Defendant: 3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff: Jeffrey R Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jeno v. Hill et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04269
Plaintiff: Keith E. Jeno
Defendant: Corporal Hill and Corporal Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant: ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent: CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee: CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver: MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Tepe v. Corker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff: Mawule Tepe
Defendant: Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Jones v. Warden et al
as 2:2023cv00342
Plaintiff: Rasheed A. Jones
Defendant: NCC Warden, CO Baker, LT Clayborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Abdus-Shakur
as 1:2023cv01885
Plaintiff: Johnanita Baker and Johnanita Nicole Baker
Defendant: Sekou Abdus-Shakur and Progressive Select Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Busby et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv03304
Defendant: Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff: Johnnie Winston Busby, Gerold A Abbott, Russell Ackerman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
BAKER et al v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2023cv00566
Plaintiff: SIMPSON BAKER and LILLIAN BAKER
Defendant: DAVID MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Counsellor v. GrillMarx HC, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01740
Plaintiff: Ross Counsellor
Defendant: GrillMarx HC, LLC, Jacqueline Baker-Nees and GrillMarx HC, LLC doing business as GrilIMarx Steakhouse & Raw Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?