Cases 61 - 70 of 944
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lilly v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 5:2023ct03273
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Lilly
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Katherine Jackson, Suzan Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carballo-Chacon v. Ray, Warden
as 5:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
Raul Enrique Carballo-Chacon
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vaughn v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00296
Petitioner:
Teddy Vaughn
Respondent:
Ms. Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paulino v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00275
Petitioner:
Rafael Paulino
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Movement Mortgage LLC v. Summit Funding, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC
Defendant:
Summit Funding, Inc., Matt Schoolfield, Chris Shelton and others
Dentro et al v. Hawkeye Contracting Company, LLC
as 2:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Heather Dentro and Cody Baisden
Defendant:
Hawkeye Contracting Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Weckman v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00282
Petitioner:
Christopher Weckman
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthew Adkins v. Appalachian Power Company
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW ADKINS and HEATHER ADKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
APPALACHIAN POWER COMPANY, a foreign public utility corporation and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
